Tag: Dane Van Niekerk

All Time XIs – Given Names Beginning With D

A look at some of the greatest cricketers to have given names beginning with D and a large photo gallery.

Today I select an all time XI of players whose given names begin with D. There will be quite a few honourable mentions.

THE XI IN BATTING ORDER

  1. David Warner (Australia, left handed opening batter). Few openers with given names beginning with D make a really strong case for inclusion, and in spite of various question marks (lack of runs in spin friendly India and Sri Lanka, ditto in swing and seam friendly England and New Zealand) about him this guy has to have the number one slot in this XI.
  2. Desmond Haynes (West Indies, right handed opening batter). His test record is excellent, and he habitually opened with a more attack minded partner in Gordon Greenidge. He would be an excellent foil to Warner.
  3. *Donald Bradman (Australia, handed batter, captain). Indisputably the best test batter there has ever been, and a splendid captain into the bargain.
  4. David Gower (England, left handed batter). A stylish left hander who also had enough steel to score 8,000 test runs at an average of 44.
  5. Denis Compton (England, right handed batter, left arm wrist spinner). Lost six years to WWII, was dogged for most of his post-war career by knee troubles and still had a superb record at the highest level.
  6. Dane van Niekerk (South Africa, right handed batter, leg spinner). The most controversial selection I have yet made in this latest blogging venture. She has not had the opportunity to play a test match, but her record in ODIs is better than her record in T20Is, which suggests that longer formats suit her. She is an attacking batter and a big spinner of the ball.
  7. +Don Tallon (Australia, wicket keeper, right handed batter). One of the greatest keepers ever to play the game and a more than adequate middle order batter. My chosen captain would be the first to endorse my choice of wicket keeper, since he rated Tallon the best he ever saw in action.
  8. Daniel Vettori (New Zealand, left handed batter, left arm orthodox spinner). New Zealand has not produced vast numbers of quality spin bowlers, but he was one of them. In 1999 as a youngster he played a huge role in consigning England to the home series loss that put them at the bottom of the world test rankings.
  9. Dennis Lillee (Australia, right arm fast bowler, right handed batter). One of the greatest fast bowlers ever to play the game.
  10. Dale Steyn (South Africa, right arm fast bowler, right handed batter). Even South Africa, which has produced a wealth of quality pacers, has had precious few to match Dale Steyn.
  11. David Harris (Hambledon, right arm fast bowler, right handed batter). The game’s first unarguably great bowler, largely responsible for the fact that catches are now credited to the bowler (simply because he showed precisely how bowlers can bowl with the specific intention of generating catches in mind). He would need a law change to be able to bowl in the style that he did back then, a matter I have covered in previous blog posts. My final word on this selection refers to the latter stages of his career: he was crippled by gout, but was so important to his team that they used to bring an armchair on to the field so that he could rest his feet when not actually bowling.

This side has strong batting, and with Lillee, Steyn and Harris to bowl pace and two contrasting front line spinners in Vettori and van Niekerk plus Compton as back up it is also well served in the spin department. Add to this a great captain and an outstanding keeper and you see a side with all bases covered.

HONOURABLE MENTIONS

Before I go into general honourable mentions there is a particular slot to be given special treatment…

THE NUMBER SIX SLOT

There is of course someone who regularly batted at number six for Australia with distinction and whose given name begins with D: Doug Walters. The reason for my omission of Walters is down to the balance of the side – Walters was a batter who bowled, while I wanted an all rounder, and a spin bowling all rounder for preference. Within the brief of ‘spin bowling all rounder’ the main rival to van Niekerk was David Holford of the West Indies, but he did not really measure up in either department. Dattu Phadkar of India, a middle order batter and a bowler of fast medium or off spin according to circumstances had a fine FC record, but his international record was decidedly ordinary. Deandra Dottin of the West Indies was a seam bowling all rounder, and there was a significant decline between her records at T20I and ODI cricket, which suggests that genuinely long form cricket would not suit her at all. My contention here is a simple one: of all those I could have selected for this slot Dane van Niekerk most closely meets the specific requirements of this XI.

OTHER HONOURABLE MENTIONS

Don Kenyon was a fine opener for Worcestershire, but a failure for England. Deep Dasgupta once scored a century for India against England as an opener, but his presence in that role said more about the nature of the pitches and of the fact that the best Indian batters of the time disliked opening than it did about his skills. His wicket keeping is a red herring in this context since he ranks several miles below Tallon in that department. Two other Aussie batters besides Walters who had to be overlooked were Dean Jones and Darren Lehmann. Dilip Vengsarkar of India had a good test record, and was among the few of his day who fared better against the West Indies than he did overall, but no way could he displace Compton. Daryl Cullinan of South Africa was another who was unlucky to miss out. Duleep Mendis of Sri Lanka did enough to earn a mention here but not enough to force his way in. Daryl Mitchell of New Zealand is a fine middle order batter. Douglas Jardine was a good player and a great captain. Denis Lindsay of South Africa had one great series with the bat against Australia, but that was not enough to displace Tallon as keeper. Derek Shackleton was a superbly reliable and consistent medium pacer, taking 100 or more FC wickets in each of 20 successive English seasons, and would get the nod for the third seamer’s slot if I were to be debarred from selecting Harris. Devon Malcolm was fast, and on his day, as when he took 9-57 against South Africa he could be unplayable, but when it wasn’t his day he could also go round the park. Doug Wright, the Kent and England leg spinner of the immediate post war era was too erratic – in between the moments of devastation, which included taking a record seven first class hat tricks he could leak runs at an alarming rate. Doug Bollinger had some good moments, but his performance at Adelaide in 2010 when he could barely raise a gallop sent my estimation of him through the floor. Dushmantha Chameera of Sri Lanka is as yet unproven, but may force his way in eventually, as may Dilshan Madushanka. David ‘Butch’ White of Hampshire had some great moments while not quite meriting selection.

PHOTOGRAPHS

My usual sign off…

Super Sunday At The Womens World Cup

An account of Super Sunday at the womens World Cup.

INTRODUCTION

Today featured no fewer than four matches in the womens cricket World Cup. I have been listening to radio commentaries and following the action on cricinfo. 

SOUTH AFRICA V WEST INDIES

This was about as conclusive a victory as I have ever witnessed. First of all South Africa blew the West Indies away for 48. Marizanne Kapp took four wickets, but the most remarkable performance came from Dane Van Niekerk who matched Kapp’s four wickets, but took hers without conceding a run. South Africa then took a mere 6.2 of their possible 50 overs to knock the runs off. Cricinfo have recently started providing video clips, and below is a two minute video showing the West Indies collapse.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/video_audio/1108001.html

INDIA V PAKISTAN

This was the damp squib of the four matches – India limped to 169-9 from their 50 overs and then Pakistan were bowled out for 74 in response, only getting that many courtesy of a 23 run last wicket stand.

ENGLAND V SRI LANKA

Sri Lanka batted first, and managed 204-8. Fran Wilson took an amazing catch along the way (see link below). Laura Marsh returning to the England side took 4-45 from her ten overs, while Katherine Brunt and Anya Shrubsole both bowled well without picking up wickets.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-womens-world-cup-2017/engine/match/1085953.html

Both openers were out fairly cheaply, Tammy Beaumont for 12 and Lauren Winfield, returning from injury, for 26. A big stand between Sarah Taylor and Heather Knight then took England to the brink of victory, before Knight was out for 82. A crunching boundary straight down the ground from Taylor completed the job, leaving her with 74 not out off 67 balls, and England winners by seven wickets with almost 20 overs to spare. At the other end, not having faced a ball, was Natalie Sciver, fresh from scoring 137 off 92 balls against Pakistan.

AUSTRALIA V NEW ZEALAND

Half centuries from Bates and Perkins got New Zealand to a total of 219-9. For Australia Mooney and Bolton were out fairly cheaply, before Meg Lanning and Ellyse Perry shared a good partnership. 16 year old legspinner Amelia Kerr created a bit of excitement when she accounted for Lanning and Elyse Villani in successive deliveries to make it 143-4, but Alex Blackwell was her usual unflappable self, and New Zealand gained only one more wicket, when with the scores level Ellyse Perry holed out for 71. Perry, having started out as a fast bowler who gave it a whack down the order has developed into the most complete all-rounder of either sex currently playing the game – she bats at number four, averaging over 50, and takes the new ball and (in limited overs matches) bowls at the death. 

FINAL THOUGHTS

None pof the four matches were especially close, but three of them featured quality cricket from various players, and I was pleased to see matches being played concurrently, because one reason why mens world cups always seem so interminable is that in deference to the TV people this does not happen.