Spring is in full swing here in Norfolk. The photographs presented below were all taken between Monday afternoon and yesterday morning.
























































































A photo gallery from Monday afternoon, Tuesday and Wednesday morning.
A look a two of test cricket’s daftest dismissals, the second of which happened yesterday. Also a huge photo gallery, making the most of the arrival of spring.
In the recent test match between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka two Sri Lankan batters scored centuries in both innings, and a Bangladeshi batter suffered the dismissal that prompted this little squib. I offer two contenders only, starting with…
LITTON DAS’ BRAINFADE
You are facing your first ball, with your side already reeling at 37-4. What do you do? If you are Litton Das you have an almighty heave and hole out in the deep, turning 37-4 into 37-5. Sadly, although this particular dismissal stands out for its sheer awfulness Bangladesh have had far too many moments of lack of application/ lack of mental toughness in their 24 years as a test playing nation, and such progress as they have made in that time is barely measurable.
WHY DID HE DO THAT!!!
You are Shannon Gabriel, specialist fast bowler with zero pretensions as a batter, and your side, the West Indies are nine wickets down with seven possible deliveries left in the match. At the other end, waiting to bat out the last over and leave the pitch with the draw secured, is Roston Chase with 110 not out to his name. What do you do? Mr Gabriel had a wild yahoo and succeeded in losing his wicket, handing the match, and with it the series, to Pakistan. The West Indian commentator’s agonized shout of “WHY DID HE DO THAT???!!!” is only too understandable in the circumstances.
MY VERDICT
On the one hand Litton Das is a proper batter and Shannon Gabriel one of the more genuine of genuine tail enders, which would seem to militate against the Bangladeshi. On the other hand Bangladesh were miles from any hope of escape in the match, whereas Gabriel knew that if he simply kept out one ball it would Roston Chase’s task to survive the remaining over, and he knew that Chase had a ton to his name and would be seeing it like a watermelon. Thus on the ground that the end goal was in plain sight for Gabriel and not remotely visible for Das, while acknowledging that Das had an absolute shocker, and that no one should have got out like that in that situation I give the verdict to Gabriel.
PHOTOGRAPHS
I have a massive photo gallery to share…






















































































































































The third and final part of mini-series looking at South African cricket history. As usual I also have a fine photo gallery.
This is third part of a mini-series looking at South Africa’s cricket history (follow the links to part one and part two to complete the picture) looking at the period since they were readmitted to international cricket.
THE XI IN BATTING ORDER
This side has a powerful batting line up, three of the finest fast bowlers ever to play the game, a quality spinner, a great keeper, a great captain, and two of the six batters would be legitimate bowling options as well.
HONOURABLE MENTIONS
The biggest miss by far was Shaun Pollock. I do not like not having any spin available, and Boucher at six and Pollock at seven would be something of gamble. I always select with long form cricket in mind, so I want the best keeper. But for this latter I could get Pollock in on a minor gamble by playing Quinton de Kock as keeper, have him bat at six (dropping McMillan), Pollock at seven, one place above his most frequent slot for SA, and then my four chosen bowlers.
Dean Elgar was a gritty and determined left handed opener, but with Smith inked in I wanted my second opener to be right handed, so he missed out. Gary Kirsten, another tough left handed opener can have a coaching gig – another job he has done well.
Had Daryll Cullinan been able to handle Australian leg spinners as well as he did other bowlers he would have given me more pause than he actually did. He averaged six runs less per knock at test level than de Villiers to whom I gave his regular number four slot.
Francois ‘Faf’ Du Plessis was a good middle order batter, but South Africa’s power in that department over the years keeps him out. Also in his last innings against England he repeatedly handled the ball – England complained about it, but wrongly IMO did not use the ultimate sanction of appealing against him – the umpire would have had to raise the finger.
Ashwell Prince had a respectable test record but again the strength of the middle order keeps him out.
I would have liked to be able to include Paul ‘frog in a blender’ Adams, but his record was unfortunately not as remarkable as his bowling action.
Two seriously fast bowlers who had to miss out were Mornantau ‘Nantie’ Hayward who was to inconsistent to challenge my actual choices and Anrich Nortje who does not yet have the weight of achievement to merit selection.
PHOTOGRAPHS
My usual sign off…













































































A look at South African cricketers in that country’s period as a pariah nation. Also a bumper photo gallery.
In my previous post I looked at South Africa’s first incarnation as a test playing nation. Now I look at the period when the repugnant policies of the apartheid government finally caused South Africa to be banned from the international arena. Some of the players named in this XI did play test cricket, but in all cases they were prominent on the world stage at a time when playing for South Africa was not officially possible., and none played for any country other than South Africa.
THE XI IN BATTING ORDER
The batting line up is powerful, and there is plenty of depth with Procter a genuine AR and Jefferies and Le Roux as noted both handy lower order batters. The bowling, with a front line attack of Van der Bijl, Le Roux, Jefferies, Procter and Hobson plus Rice as sixth bowler, and Eddie Barlow unlikely ever to get a look in is simply awesome. The spin department is unquestionably light, with Procter’s off spin incarnation the only remotely serious support for Hobson’s leggies, but this attack should be well capable of capturing 20 opposition wickets on any surface nevertheless.
HONOURABLE MENTIONS
Graeme Pollock played on through the 1970s, but having (correctly IMO) named him in the first squad I decided to keep him out of this one. Other than that I have little to add to the above.
PHOTOGRAPHS
My usual sign off…




















































































An XI from South Africa’s first period as a test playing nation and a huge photo gallery.
This is the first of what will be three posts about South African cricket – I will also cover the period of isolation and their second incarnation as a test nation. I have previously done an all time SA post (click here, although a current version would show some changes).
THE XI IN BATTING ORDER
This side has great batting depth, with only Adcock absolutely incapable of assisting in that department and a well varied bowling attack. The seam department is a little light, with Goddard third in line in that department, but I would not anticipate this side struggling to take 20 opposition wickets.
HONOURABLE MENTIONS
I ruled out Barry Richards, reserving him for the 1970-91 side, as four test matches is an insufficient sample, and unlike RG Pollock he was seen all around the world after the enforced ending of his international career. That meant that other than my choices there were two serious candidates for the opening berths – Alan Melville and Eric Rowan. Melville, because of WWII, only got to play 11 test matches, though his record was outstanding in those matches. Rowan was nearly as awkward a customer for his team mates and the SA cricketing authorities as he was for opposition bowlers.
Two great figures from the early days of SA cricket, Jimmy Sinclair (their first ever test centurion) and Arthur William ‘Dave’ Nourse missed out because their records lacked sufficient substance to back up their legendary status.
The only rival for Faulkner’s slot was Eddie Barlow, but his test record was that of a batter who bowled, not an all rounder, so I opted for Faulkner as offering a more complete package. Some would have opted for Denis Lindsay as keeper, but he only had one really good series, whereas Waite was a consistent performer over a long period of time.
I regarded all my four specialist bowlers as having ironclad cases for inclusion. Of the quicker bowlers Peter Heine was the unluckiest to miss out based on concrete achievements. We have no way of knowing how great Krom Hendricks might have been if given the chance, and ‘Buster’ Nupen was superb on matting pitches but ineffective on turf, a disparity that is reflected in his modest test record. Athol Rowan was possibly an even more talented off spinner than Hugh Tayfield, but a knee injury sustained during WWII ruined his career.
PHOTOGRAPHS
My usual sign off…















































































































A look back at the final day of Six Nations 2024 action, and a bumper photo gallery, presented in three parts.
The 2024 Six Nations rugby tournament concluded late yesterday evening, with France playing England in Lyon in a match that would decide second and third spots in the final table. This match was the third match a final day and that it had no bearing on who won the tournament shows that the schedulers miscalculated somewhat.
THE EARLIER GAMES
The first match of the day saw Wales and Italy facing one another in a game that Wales had to win to avoid the wooden spoon. A win for Italy would make it their best ever Six Nations showing. It was also confirmed as a final international appearance for George North of Wales, and I suspect there may be other members of this Welsh squad who will not be seen at international level again. The Italians were 11-0 up at half time, and a converted try right at the start of the second half extended the lead to 18. At that point Wales finally showed a hint of fighting spirit, and in the end the final score was remarkably close, but Italy’s early dominance had ensured that justice was done, and that they did indeed record the win that gave them their best ever Six Nations showing.
Ireland needed only a single point from their match against Scotland to ensure that they would retain the championship that they won last year. Scotland came out fighting, making it clear from the word go that they were not just there to assist in Ireland’s coronation. Ireland proved good enough in the end, and retained their championship, underlining their status as the current dominant force in European rugby.
FRANCE V ENGLAND
This match would have no bearing on who won the tournament, but no game between these old rivals is ever meaningless, and there was plenty of pride at stake, as well as which of these sides would end up in second place. The match was an absolute belter of a game. The lead changed many times. With only a few minutes to go England got a penalty, and in the situation George Ford opted to kick for the corner hoping to set up a try rather than settle for three points. A superb kick gave England a line out just ten metres from the try line, and some slick work from that line out got them the try, and Ford, as unerring with the boot as he had been all game, duly scored the conversion to put England ahead. Then, with 38 seconds left on the clock France were awarded a penalty. For them, with three points being sufficient to re-establish their lead in the dying seconds it was a ‘must kick’ opportunity, though at 49 metres it was a major challenge to do so. Ramos, the French kicker, managed to put it over and the home crowd celebrated. There was time for the match to restart, but there was never any doubt that the French would retain possession for long enough thereafter to hang on for the win and with it second place in the table.
PHOTOGRAPHS
Yesterday was a very spring like day, and I deliberately extended my walks to and from King’s Lynn library where there was a ‘just a cuppa’ morning for autistic adults to take full advantage of it. Thus comes a gallery three parts…
Friday afternoon’s walk and the walk to the library…























































Lego architecture at the coffee morning…


















The walk back from the library…




















With precisely three weeks to go until the start of the English season I offer up an XI of county stalwarts who played in my lifetime. I also have a splendid photo gallery.
I present an XI of county stalwarts from my lifetime. I have allowed myself one overseas player only, and when it came to the home players the accent was on folk who were IMO treated shabbily by the England selectors. There will be a very brief honourable mentions section at the end. I also have a splendid photo gallery for you – the last couple of days have been genuinely springlike.
THE XI IN BATTING ORDER
This side has a powerful top five, plenty of scope for runs from the middle and lower middle order, with Foakes and Stevens genuinely front line batters, Hadlee almost so and even Carrick better than most number nines would be in that department. The bowling, with Hadlee’s pace, two very different types of high quality medium-fast in Porter and Watkin, Carrick’s spin and Steven’s medium pace should not struggle to take 20 wickets either. Though I have acknowledged the bowling capacities of some of the batters, I do not see any of them, with the possible exception of Hick on a fourth day pitch, being needed.
HONOURABLE MENTIONS
Those who read my county all time XIs back in 2020 would have noted from them that if I choose an overseas player I nearly always go for a bowler, and that being the case along with my desire to pick a long serving county player narrowed the potential choices down to two – Hadlee, who I actually opted for, and Malcolm Marshall (Hampshire). There is little to choose between two such outstanding cricketers, and I would be happy to see Marshall at number eight as well.
The spinner was a difficult choice, because with Hick in the ranks I preferred either a left armer or a leggie as my primary spinner. No English leggie has had a really good record in recent years (and Matt Parkinson, the nearest thing to such and animal, would have meant a genuine nine, ten, jack), and not many left armers have been that special either (and the two most obvious candidates, Tufnell and Panesar would cause the same worry as Parkinson batting wise). I could have found another English pacer, and picked Warne as overseas player, but I did not think his period at Hampshire was extensive enough to qualify.
Had I not been concentrating my attention on those who were badly treated by selectors then Marcus Trescothick (Somerset) would have had Chris Dent’s slot. Two men of Kent, Mark Benson (one England cap in 1986) and David Fulton (uncapped by England) were in with a shout for Mitchell’s slot.
Two other opening bowlers to be ignored by England in spite of excellent FC records were Ben Coad (Yorkshire) and Ben Sanderson (Northamptonshire).
PHOTOGRAPHS
My usual sign off…











































































































An all time XI selected on a basis of juxtaposing ancient and modern – six players from way back, five players from the 21st century, interleaving with one another so that no two players from the same era are next to each other in the batting order, Also a bumper photo gallery.
In this post I present an all time XI selected using very specific criteria – my players are either from the long past or are players at least some of whose career took place in the 21st century, and the interleave so that no two players from the same era are next to each other in the line up.
THE XI IN BATTING ORDER
This side has a powerhouse batting line up, and a bowling attack of Barnes, Bumrah and Mycroft to bowl pace/seam/swing and Ashwin and Faulkner to bowl spin, with Grace and Stokes in reserve, is not likely to have any great difficulty taking 20 opposition wickets. I will not produce an honourable mentions section on this occasion because it would have to be massive to do anything approaching justice to those who have missed out. Comments welcome, and if you are feeling really bold feel free to suggest an alternative XI selected on similar lines that you reckon could make a game of it with this one.
PHOTOGRAPHS
A bumper gallery for you today – while it has not been conspicuously sunny it has been reasonably pleasant outside…
























































































































An all time XI of some of the legends of county cricket, with the new season now 25 days away. Also a photo gallery.
Today I present an all time XI of players who all set records relating to English first class cricket, as an appetizer for the new season that is now a mere 25 days away. I have not included a specific overseas player although one of this XI was born abroad.
THE XI IN BATTING ORDER
This side has a powerhouse batting line up, with everyone down to Trott at number nine capable of being a matchwinner in that department, and with Richardson, Tate and Hirst to bowl seam/swing/pace, Freeman, Trott, Rhodes and Woolley as front line slow bowlers and Grace and Compton also available to bowl taking 20 wickets should not pose a problem on any surface.
HONOURABLE MENTIONS
I will limit myself to two of these: James H Parks (Sussex) was the only ever cricketer to score 3,000 first class runs and take 100 first class wickets in the same season. Herbert Sutcliffe (Yorkshire) also merits a mention for scoring 1,000 or more FC runs in every inter-war season (1919-39 inclusive).
PHOTOGRAPHS
My usual sign off…





































































A look back at the test match in Dharamsala and at the India v England series as a whole, and a composite XI for the series. Also a huge photo gallery.
The final test match of the India v England series at Dharamsala ended earlier today after barely half the allotted playing time, with India winning by an innings and 64 runs to take the series 4-1. This post looks back at the match (I missed two major chunks of play – on day one because it was a work day and on day two because the West Norfolk Autism Group had a committee meeting, but still got enough of the action to have a decent idea of what went on) and at the series, including naming a composite XI for the series.
THE PRELIMINARIES
Ollie Robinson’s injury forced one change on England, and they opted to recall Mark Wood rather than give Gus Atkinson a game, a mistake IMO, but one that had zero effect on the outcome. This meant that Jonathan Bairstow became without doubt the least deserving ever recipient of 100 test caps. India dropped Patidar (I choose to consider the official line about getting an ankle injury during training to be absolute BS) and brought in Devdutt Paddikal for a test debut, while Bumrah returned after a one match rest. England won the toss and opted to bat first on a flat looking pitch.
DAY ONE
England started well, with Crawley playing nicely and Duckett helping to push the score into the 60s before the first wicket fell. Pope never looked at home and was out to the daftest dismissal of the series, when he gave Kuldeep Yadav the charge, playing for spin that wasn’t there and walking straight past the ball to be stumped by a ridiculous margin. Root and Crawley took the score to 134 before Crawley’s innings ended for 79. Bairstow and Root had taken things to 175-3 but then came an epic collapse, and moments later the score read 183-8. Foakes, left for the second successive innings to attempt to shepherd Bashir and Anderson, did enough that England reached 218, still an obviously inadequate total. I missed most of the start of the Indian innings, but they ended day 1 on 135-1, Jaiswal having gone after taking his series aggregate to 712 runs.
DAY TWO
Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill batted superbly and India were in to the lead with only one wicket down. Both these batters notched centuries and got out shortly thereafter, but the debutant Paddikal and Sarfaraz Khan continued to good work and at one stage India looked set for a really mammoth total. However, they lost wickets while I was out, and by the end of the day were 473-8. Shoaib Bashir having conceded 100 in his first 20 overs had hauled things back and was on 4-170 by the close. Anderson had claimed his 699th test wicket.
THE FINAL HUMILIATION
Anderson got his 700th test wicket, and Bashir ended the Indian innings by claiming his fifth wicket, his second test five-for in his debut series. There was little else for England to enjoy. Duckett suffered a crazy bowled dismissal, trying to charge Ashwin who took the new ball alongside Bumrah. Crawley failed cheaply as well, turning one from Ashwin into the hands of Sarfaraz Khan, and Pope fell to catch by Jaiswal off Ashwin. That was 36-3. Bairstow flashed his way to 39 off 30 balls before falling LBW to Kuldeep Yadav and that was 92-4. Right on the stroke of lunch Stokes concluded a wretched series with the bat (and he only bowled at all in this match, taking a wicket with his first ball in nine months but otherwise doing nothing of note) by being bowled by Ashwin, against whom he seemed to have not a scooby, for 2. England at 103-5 needed 147 more just to avoid the innings defeat. Foakes fell for 8, also bowled by Ashwin and it was 113-6. Tom Hartley offered Root some support, but he and Wood were both pinned LBW by Bumrah in the space of three balls (and if Wood knew anything about the intermediate delivery I am a Dutchman) and that was 141-8. Shoaib Bashir offered Root support, and the prospect a century for the Yorkshireman appeared on the horizon. However with the partnership with 48 a delivery from Jadeja kept low and bowled Bashir to make it 189-9. With Anderson at the other end Root aimed a big shot against Kuldeep Yadav and succeeded only in picking out Jasprit Bumrah to fall for 84. England 195 all out, Root 84. Kuldeep Yadav was named Player of the Match for his seven wickets, five of them taken in the first innings, and Yashavsi Jaiswal was named Player of the Series.
ANALYSIS
This series was played on excellent cricket wickets – these were not at any stage of any match raging turners, and everyone had the chance to get in the game. India won 4-1, and are in truth not flattered by that margin, because they have the better cricketers, and they generally played somewhere close to their best. Crawley’s series was reminiscent of the one Shane Watson had in the 2010-11 Ashes – respectable aggregate and average, but no really major innings, and like Watson he was part of a well beaten side. Duckett had his moments, including a superb century, and he and Crawley usually have England a solid start, while not coming close to being a latter day Hobbs and Sutcliffe. Where England failed abysmally was in the number 3-6 positions in the order. The 40 innings played by those players across the series (four players, 10 innings each) yielded exactly three major innings – Pope’s 196 in the first match, Root 122* at Ranchi and Root 84 in the second innings at Dharamsala. When the engine room of the batting is failing to that extent one cannot really expect other than a hammering. In the 1924-5 Ashes Hobbs and Sutcliffe both had superb series, but were largely unsupported by the rest of the order and England lost 4-1. Here Crawley and Duckett were not as good as Hobbs and Sutcliffe had been 99 years ago, and the middle order failed even worse. Only Anderson, who became only the third ever bowler and first ever seamer to record 700 test scalps, was remotely effective among England’s pace bowlers, but India’s pacers were not brilliant either. Hartley and Bashir as front line spinners did more than anyone could have expected of them, and Bashir especially looks hugely promising, but they were unsurprisingly outclassed by their rather more experienced Indian counterparts. Foakes kept impeccably through the series, but Dhruv Jurel also did superbly once he replaced the underachieving Srikar Bharat, and Jurel was a clear cut matchwinner at Ranchi. Thus India were, thanks to Jaiswal, somewhat ahead when it came to openers, in a different league from England in slots 3-6, ahead on pace (Bumrah being better in the series than the veteran Anderson) and ahead on spin, though less one-sidedly so than might have been expected, equal on keeping, and probably equal on captaincy, though to make up for his shocking series as a player Stokes would have had to captain like peak Brearley, and he certainly did not do so. I do not think that either Wood (now 35 and unlike Anderson seriously injury prone) or Oliver Edward Robinson (too many fitness issues) should feature for England again, and it is long past time to confine Bairstow’s activities to white ball cricket. I also feel England need a genuine number three – barring his one great innings at Hyderabad Pope has looked further at sea than Captain Nemo and the Nautilus in this series. Josh Bohannon is the best number three currently playing county cricket, while Jamie Smith (Surrey) and James Rew (Somerset) must in the reckoning to replace Bairstow at number five. Bashir should keep his place as should Anderson for the present. Among younger pace options Matthew Potts, Josh Tongue, Gus Atkinson and Tom Lawes should all be considered in the immediate term, and I would have half an eye on the progress of James T Langridge of Somerset who showed signs of promise when thrust into One Day Cup action as a 17 year old last season.
In terms of the team approach, I am all for attacking cricket, but what we saw far too much in this series was brainless batting – large numbers of wickets simply thrown away. Also some of the players public utterances (Duckett’s comments about Jaiswal learning from England’s approach being an example – almost as ridiculous in their way as was Pope’s first innings dismissal at Dharamsala in its way).
COMPOSITE XI FOR THE SERIES
PHOTOGRAPHS
Time for my usual sign off…







































































































