Tag: Test Cricket

England Go 1-0 Up In India

An account of an amazing finish in Hyderabad and a mention of another in Brisbane.

This morning saw two superb test match finishes. I was following the India v England match on Talk Sport2, while over on Five Live Sports Extra TMS were covering Australia v West Indies. A West Indies side who lacked most of their best known names and had been written off in brutal terms in the run up to the series, and who were 0-1 down in a two match series (this latter is an abomination that should never occur) managed to overcome Australia, winning by a slender eight runs. The body of this post is devoted the action I was listening to, in Hyderabad.

ENGLAND CREATE HOPE

England resumed 126 runs ahead of India with four second innings wickets standing (see here for an account of days 1-3). Rehan Ahmed and Tom Hartley both provided good support to Ollie Pope, while the Surrey man headed towards a double hundred. At 173 he established a new record for a visiting number three batter in a second innings in India, beating the 172 scored by Ken Barrington at Kanpur in 1961. At 177 he passed Alastair Cook’s record for the highest second innings score in India by any English batter. The loss of Hartley and Wood in quick succession, which brought a limping Leach to the crease (the left arm spinner has a knee injury, though he managed to both bat and bowl today) derailed Pope’s advance on the 200 mark, and in the new circumstances he essayed a somewhat desperate reverse sweep and was out for 196. Given the circumstances (India, pitch showing signs of misbehaviour – the ball that got Rehan Ahmed went through very low indeed, England under the gun for much of his innings) this was as good a test knock as has been played by an English batter in my lifetime. England had reached 420, setting India 231 to win the match. Lunch was taken at the end of the England innings. Few Indian bowlers had cause to enquire to closely as to their figures, but the shining exception was Jasprit Bumrah, who somehow conjured up figures of 4-41. Bumrah now has 146 test wickets at 20.85, which means that of bowlers who have finished with more wickets than him precisely two, Sydney Francis Barnes of England, 189 at 16.43 each and Alan Keith Davidson of Australia with 186 at 20.53 each have better averages than the Indian pace ace.

THE INDIAN CHASE

Rohit Sharma began well for India, while Tom Hartley, perhaps heartened by having batted so well, was a different bowler from the guy who took only just more than 20 overs to concede 100 in the first innings. Hartley got Jaiswal, who had given him a lot of stick in the first innings, and also got Shubman Gill cheaply. Gill has talent to burn, but the hard facts are that after a decent number of tests he now averages below 30 at that level, which is not the stuff of which number threes are made. At 63 Hartley made his most important intervention to date, pinning Sharma LBW for 39 (the Indian skipper sent it upstairs, but it couldn’t have been much plumber than it actually was). Axar Patel was promoted to number five in the hope that the presence of a left hander would disrupt Hartley. He batted reasonably until with 17 to his name he pushed one straight back to Hartley and it was 95-4. At 107 KL Rahul fell LBW to Leach. At 119 came a double blow which virtually settled the issue, Jadeja being run out by Stokes’ direct hit throw and then Shreyas Iyer being caught by Root off Leach. That left India needing 112, with keeper Bharat, off spinning all rounder Ashwin and the two rank tail enders Bumrah and Siraj to score them. Bharat and Ashwin threatened for a while, scoring 57 together before Hartley got one through Bharat;s defences for his fifth wicket of the innings. One run later a smart stumping by Foakes off Hartley sent Ashwin on his way, leaving the two specialist bowlers to attempt to score 54 more for victory. Virtually every ball, especially those faced by Siraj, looked capable of yielding the final wicket, but the end was prolonged deep into the extra eight overs, claimed by England to finish things today, as fortune favoured the batters for a time. Eventually Siraj charged down the pitch against Hartley and missed his shot giving Foakes the easiest of stumping chances, which the keeper made look every bit as easy as it was. India were all out for 202 giving England victory by 28 runs. Hartley, so awful in the first innings, had redeemed himself with 7-62 second time round. Pope, who had taken a couple of catches early in the Indian innings to go with his magnificent 196 was deservedly named Player of the Match. Without his innings there would have been nothing for England to defend. India had cause to rue the cavalier way in which they batted in the first innings – they could and should have scored well over 500 against the England bowling of that innings, and that would have prevented any chance of them facing a target in the face of which they could collapse.

Here are links to full scorecards of this match and AUS v WI.

PHOTOGRAPHS

My usual sign off…

Spring flowers in The Walks this afternoon.
The inclusion of this pic is a tribute to the victors in Brisbane.

Game on in Hyderabad

A look at the action in the first three days of the test match between India and England in Hyderabad and a photo gallery.

India and England are currently locked in battle at Hyderabad, and after three days of play there is just a chance of decent finish. This post looks at the action so far.

PRELIMINARIES

There were huge question marks over England’s selections. James Anderson was overlooked and three front line spinners were named – Rehan Ahmed, Jack Leach and Tom Hartley. Ahmed is 19 years old and hugely promising, Leach is England’s best current front line spinner (alas, not the highest of bars), while Hartley was quite frankly a joke of a selection – Lancashire’s decision to sign Nathan Lyon as overseas player for the upcoming season tells you what they think of him as a red ball cricketer. With Brook having withdrawn from the series for personal reasons even England could find no excuse for not playing Ben Foakes, so at least the gauntlets were in good hands.

DAY ONE

England won the toss and batted. 70 from Ben Stokes got them to 246, which didn’t look too bad. However India got off to an absolute flier in reply, helped by Tom Hartley bowling some utter rubbish – he was at that point going at seven an over on a turner. Only the experienced Leach, with 1-24 from nine overs was anywhere near test standard with the ball, and India were 119-1 overnight.

DAY TWO

India moved into seemingly complete control, even though their batting was far from flawless – virtually every wicket they lost was down to bat batting rather than good bowling, three players reached 80, and two of those three got themselves out in the 80s, while the third, Jadeja, was unbeaten at the close. The day ended with Axar Patel scoring 14 off the last three balls, bowled by Hartley, who in spite of being donated two test wickets never looked remotely like the real deal. India were 421-7 and ahead by 175.

DAY THREE

I missed the first session due to not understanding the workings of my phone’s alarm system – it has different settings for week days and weekends. England took the last three Indian wickets quickly, restricting the deficit to 190. The most damning stat of the innings for England was that with three front line spinners selected Joe Root, very much a batter who bowls, had taken 4-79`. By lunch England were 89-1, with Crawley gone, but Duckett and Pope, who had been very jumpy in the first innings, both going well.

The afternoon session belonged to India, with four wickets going down, but Foakes staunched the flow of wickets and settled into a partnership with Pope. In the evening session Pope and Foakes continued to prosper, their partnership reaching 112, before a freak delivery from Axar Patel, which shot along the deck, accounted for Foakes. Pope had by then completed a century, and Rehan Ahmed proved to be a good partner as well. By the close England were 316-6, with Pope 148* and looking every inch a test match number three. England thus lead by 126. Given the paucity of their bowling, even with the pitch showing signs of genuine mischief they probably need to double their current advantage to really worry India, but the situation is not completely hopeless, as it seemed to be at the end of day two.

PHOTOGRAPHS

My usual sign off…

History in Mumbai

A look back at the events that have unfolded in Mumbai over the last few days, a historic win for India Women in a test match over Australia women. Also a photo gallery.

Four days ago a test match between the Indian and Australian Women’s teams got underway in the city of Mumbai. I was only able to follow developments through cricinfo and some of my twitter and mastodon followers, so this post will be a bit sketchy, but you will see why I could not ignore it. India Women had never beaten Australia Women in a test match going into the game, but they had just won a test against England Women in Mumbai…

THE AUSTRALIAN FIRST INNINGS

The first hint that not all was going to the way of Australia came in the first innings of the match, when they managed only 219, with Pooja Vastrakar taking four wickets, Sneh Rana three and Deepti Sharma two. Vastrakar’s effort was especially significant – both because day one often sets the tone and because seamers should do well early in matches.

THE INDIAN FIRST INNINGS

India started impressively with the bat, with Smriti Mandhana, Richa Ghosh and Jemimah Rodrigues all making runs, and looked set for a massive lead when they passed 250 with only three wickets down. They then suffered a mid-innings collapse and at273-7 it looked like an opportunity to bury the match had been squandered. However, for the all their positions at numbers eight and nine in the order both Deepti Sharma and Pooja Vastrakar are competent batters, with Sharma being a genuine all rounder in any format save T20, where her relatively slow scoring rate counts against her. This pair reasserted India’s dominance, batting all the way through the final session of the second day and taking India’s lead past 150. India ultimately topped 400, finishing with 406 for a lead of 187. Sharma had the top score of the match with 78, and Vastrakar had set a new record for an Indian number nine in a test match with 47.

THE AUSTRALIAN SECOND INNINGS

Australia, as one would expect of such a strong and determined side fought hard in their second innings, but never really threatened to take the initiative away from India. Perry, McGrath, Healy and Sutherland all provided stiff resistance, but by the close of third day Australia were five down and only 46 to the the good. Had their lower order been able to conjure another 100 on the final day Indian nerves might have been jangling, but in the end they only managed a further 28, to give themselves just 74 to defend. Sneh Rana claimed four wickets with her off spin, and two other spinners, skipper Harmanpreet Kaur and Rajeshwari Gayakwad claimed two scalps a piece, while Vastrakar added another wicket to four first innings scalps. Tahlia McGrath had battled her way to 73.

THE INDIAN CHASE

Shafali Verma was out cheaply to make it 4-1, but Richa Ghosh offered Smriti Mandhana good support, and by the time she was out only a further 20 were needed for victory. Rodrigues joined Mandhana and this pair were still together when India completed an impressive win, Mnadhana 38*, Rodrigues 12*. Sneh Rana’s seven wicket match haul earned her the Player of the Match award, though both Vastrakar (five wickets across the two innings and a vital 47) and Sharma (the highest individual score of the match and two wickets) must have been close, especially the former. All credit to India for winning this one – Australia were unbeaten in the format since 2014 going into this match. A full scorecard can be seen here.

PHOTOGRAPHS

Time for my usual sign off…

A Pulsating End to The #MAshes

A look at the conclusion to an amazing Ashes summer, a mention of a hugely successful auction and a large photo gallery.

The men’s Ashes of 2023 ended on Monday. The first part of this post looks at that final day’s play.

WHO WRITES YOUR SCRIPTS BROADY?!

After the close of play on day three of this match Stuart Broad told the world that it would be his last as a competitive cricketer. On the fourth morning he struck the last delivery he received in test cricket for six, on the fifth evening he took a wicket with his last ball as a test cricketer, giving England victory by 49 runs and a 2-2 drawn series, a result which leaves The #MAshes in Australian hands but also means that the visitors will now go longer without an away series win than any other side in the history of The Ashes – it will be 26 years since their last by the time 2027 comes round, beating the 24 years between successful England trips down under in 1986-7 and 2010-11.

Australia had looked decently placed going into the final day – 135-0, needing 249 runs more to win the match. However, both openers went quickly that final morning (Warner just before I got back from delivering Green Party leaflets in South Wootton, Khawaja just after I had tuned in). Australia were still genuinely in the hunt until Woakes, deservedly Player of the Match, England Player of the Series and winner of the Compton-Miller medal, accounted for Steve Smith, which left Carey plus the bowlers to score over 100 between them. Starc and Cummins both fell fairly cheaply, while Murphy for the second time in the match showed himself rather better than a standard number 10, but when Broad got him the writing really was on the wall. Carey was last to go, also to Broad. Moeen Ali’s test career also ended on Monday, and he took a couple of crucial wickets.

The eventual 2-2 series result was just about fair, though Australia were somewhat flattered by it – the rain ruined game at Old Trafford was going meltingly in England’s favour, and you could probably replay the first two matches of the series a thousand times over and not have Australia emerge 2-0 up.

A GREAT BANKNOTE SALE

A week ago today James and Sons had the second auction of a double header. Tuesday had featured stamps and postal history, and was a success by any normal reckoning. However, the Wednesday sale, a massive collection of banknotes, was probably the greatest success James and Sons have had in the decade since I started working there. Not only did pretty much every lot find a buyer, on most occasions they went for way more than we had dared to hope. Lot 695, expected to fetch 10-12 went for £75…

Lot 741, estimated at 25-30 went for £140…

Lot 877 was the star of the show, expected to go for 30-40 and instead soaring away for £380…

I used this lot to provide the picture for a press release I sent out yesterday.

Lot 894, expected to fetch 25-30 actually went for £180…

Any image can be viewed at full size by clicking on it.

PHOTOGRAPHS

I continue to seek and find things to photograph while out walking…

A second Holly Blue in the space of a few days, this one at the edge of the Kettlewell Lane green space.

A Composite #MAshes 2023 XI

A special butterfly picture, a composie #MAshes2023 XI with 12th man, and a splendid photo gallery.

What has been a superb Men’s Ashes (#MAshes for social media users) approaches its conclusion. The centrepiece of this post picks a composite XI from that series. However, I have plenty of other stuff to share, and before the centrepiece I have a photograph that given its significance and quality deserves special treatment (it has already generated interest on Mastodon)…

A HOLLY BLUE

I was out walking this morning when I spotted a butterfly that was new to me. I was able to get a very good photograph of the wonderful little creature, and Mastodon provided the answer to my inquiries – it was the Holly Blue, a species recognized as endangered (see this Guardian article):

A Holly Blue butterfly on a nettle leaf, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, 30/07/2023

A COMPOSITE #MASHES 2023 XI

Before I list my CXI in batting order let me emphasize that I am picking on the basis of THIS SERIES and this series only.

  1. Usman Khawaja (Australia, left handed opening batter). He has been Australia’s stand out batter of this series by a mile.
  2. Zak Crawley (England, right handed opening batter). Some, familiar with my opinions of him, will be surprised by this selection, but I am picking based on this series, and Warner has been negligible and Duckett patchy, whereas Crawley has had a fine series. It will take more than one fine series, even against the oldest enemy, to convince me that Crawley is the real deal as a test match opener, but denying plain facts is not my style, and the plain facts are that based on this series Crawley gets the slot.
  3. Marnus Labuschagne (Australia right handed batter). By his own stratospheric standards not a great series for him, but he gets the slot by default – since Pope’s injury England have struggled massively with this slot, experimenting with Brook for one innings, and then relying on Ali until his injury this match, with Stokes stepping up in their final innings.
  4. Joe Root (England, right handed batter, occasional off spinner). Only one century, but a couple of near misses as well, and the odd moment with his spin, plus some excellent catches. His opposite number, Smith, has had a decidedly quiet series.
  5. Harry Brook (England, right handed batter, occasional medium pacer). A very good series for him, though no century to show for it. It was ill advised to use him as an ersatz number three, an experiment that lasted one innings, but he played some fine knocks in his regular slot, especially at Headingley, Old Trafford and the first innings of this match at The Oval.
  6. *Ben Stokes (England, left handed batter, right arm fast medium bowler, captain). Knee problems have reduced his bowling to a virtual side show (he is allegedly practicing spin bowling in an attempt to prolong his ability to describe himself as an all rounder), but he has played at least one crucial innings, and his captaincy, not withstanding the short stuff at the Aussie tail on Friday, has been a cut above that of Cummins.
  7. +Alex Carey (Australia, wicket keeper, left handed batter). Massively the better of the two keepers on show this series, and Bairstow’s runs in the last couple of matches do not in anyway compensate for his clumsiness behind the stumps, which has cost England hundreds of runs through the series.
  8. Mitchell Starc (Australia, left arm fast bowler, left handed lower order batter). He gets smacked, but he also picks up wickets, and he provides something that no one else in the series does, in terms of the left arm angle.
  9. Mark Wood (England, right arm fast bowler, right handed lower order batter). The quickest bowler on either side, and he has had a good series.
  10. Stuart Broad (England, right arm fast medium bowler, left handed lower order batter). He has announced that the current test match will be has last match as a competitive cricketer, but this is not a sentimental pick – he has also taken over 20 wickets in the series, the fifth time he has done that against Australia, and taken his Ashes tally past 150, putting him alone among England bowlers but behind Lillee, McGrath and Warne overall.
  11. Todd Murphy (off spinner, left handed lower order batter). I didn’t want to name a side without a front line spinner, and with Leach injured before the series started and Lyon injured early in the series there was really only one option – Ali has been as ineffective as one might expect of a 36 year old with little interest in red ball cricket and a moderate prior record to be.
  12. Chris Woakes (England, right arm fast medium bowler, right handed batter). I am naming a 12th man because the veteran Warwickshire all rounder has done well, proving once again that he is formidable in England, and while I couldn’t fit him in the XI I wanted to honour him.

The starting XI has a strong batting line up, a fine keeper and a strong and balance bowling attack, and the designated 12th man could cover any vacancy other than Carey or Murphy without crippling the side.

PHOTOGRAPHS

My usual sign off…

Men’s Ashes: Climax or Anti-climax

A look at development’s in the men’s Ashes as we wait for play to get underway on day four at Old Trafford.

Today is Early Music Day at the Lynn Festival (will be blogging about this in due time), and I am making use of the long break between the first and second concerts (the second and third are basically back to back, with insufficient time between the end of one and the start of the other to come home) to keep an eye on the cricket should there be any developments at all today and to post this.

THE MEN’S ASHES – THE STORY SO FAR

Australia won the first two matches, though England had good chances in both, and could blame poor catching, especially by Bairstow behind the stumps, for the fact that they were not at least 1-1. England won a thriller at Headingley, with Harry Brook scoring a vital 75 in the final innings. That brings us to…

THE FOURTH MATCH – OLD TRAFFORD

Penultimate matches of Ashes series at Old Trafford include 1896 (2nd match of a 3 match series, Australia won by three wickets after England staged a remarkable but unavailing fightback – Ranjitsinhji on test debut conjured 154* after England were made to follow on, which meant Australia needed 125 to win, and fast bowler Tom Richardson narrowly failed to pre-empt Bob Willis’s Headingley heroics by 85 years, taking 6-76 as Australia limped over the line), 1902, when an Australian win by three runs gave them the Ashes, “Laker’s Match” of 1956, when the off spinner’s 19-90 in the match gave England victory by an innings and 170 runs and guaranteed retention of the Ashes for them, 1981, when a blazing Botham century set up victory by 103 runs which guaranteed England a series win and retention of the Ashes, and on the debit side of the ledger the bore draw of 1964 when Aussie skipper Simpson, knowing that a draw was enough for his side, literally ensured this off his own bat, occupying the crease until the third morning as Australia scored 656-8 declared (Simpson 311), England then scoring 611 to utterly kill the game.

Australia blatantly selected their side for this match with a draw in mind – they picked no specialist spinner and had two seam bowling all rounders and keeper Carey batting at number eight. England, rather than bringing in any new played had Moeen Ali officially at number three, Bairstow continuing as keeper and an 8-11 of Woakes, Wood, Broad and Anderson. England won the toss and put Australia in. The pitch proved better for batting than either side had reckoned on, and Australia’s 317, lasting just into the second day, was a definite underachievement by them. Woakes was the bowling star with five wickets. England took the bull by the horns, and it was that rarity, Crawley’s day. The Kent opener rode his luck to score a very rapid 189, backed by good performances from Ali and Root. Bairstow became the second Yorkshireman with a surname beginning with B to score 99* in a test match, as Anderson was pinned LBW before he could reach the landmark. Bairstow’s knock took a mere 81 balls, rather a contrast to the other 99* by a Yorkshire ‘B’, Boycott’s knock at Perth in the 1979-80 mini-series. England had tallied 592, a first innings advantage of 275. Wood came to the party in Australia’s second innings, claiming three wickets as Australia closed the third day on 113-4, still 162 adrift of making England bat again. There has been no play so far today, as Old Trafford’s tutelary deity, Jupiter Pluvius, has put in an appearance. There is a pitch inspection happening as I type this. The last two covers have just come off, much to the disgruntlement of the Aussies, who were hoping for today to be entirely washed out (they are looking and playing like a side who are mentally shot, and their attitude to the covers coming off is further indication of that). If the rain holds off, play will commence at 2:45PM.

PHOTOGRAPHS

Before my usual sign off, here one year on from its creation is a link to my all-time Ds XI.

Men’s and Women’s Ashes Series Both Well and Truly Alive

A look at a remarkable few days for the England men’s and women’s cricket teams, and two photo galleries.

The last few days have been excellent for both the England Men’s team and the England Women’s team. This post looks back at what both teams have done in that time.

THE MEN’S ASHES

England arrived at Headingley 0-2 down after two test matches, and with the Ashes currently in Australian hands that meant they needed to win all three remaining matches to take back the urn. England were ultimately set 251 to win in the final innings. They went into yesterday needing 224 with all ten wickets in hand. At various times it looked like Australia could do it, especially at 171-6, but then the largest England partnership of the match, between Brook and Woakes left England needing 21 with three wickets left, Brook falling for a splendid 75. That brought Mark Wood to the crease. With seven runs needed Carey dropped a chance offered by Wood, and that was the last sight Australia had of victory. At 3:45PM a boundary took England over the winning line with three wickets to spare. Wood, with seven wickets in the match and 40 runs in the two England innings was named Player of the Match.

Although England kept the series alive with this victory, all is not rosy in their garden. The number three position needs filling as a matter of urgency – England tried Brook in the first innings, and Ali in the second after Brook had looked like a cat on a hot tin roof batting there, and both failed. Also, Bairstow as keeper/ batter is proving disastrous – he has missed a load of chances and he has not been scoring runs since taking the gauntlets. Also Crawley twice tossed away promising starts with appalling choices of shot. Finally, Ali is not up to the task with either bat or ball. If England are to complete the miracle comeback all these issues need addressing. I would personally call up Dominic Sibley to open with Duckett (otherwise there would be two debutants in the top three, since I cannot countenance Crawley), select one of Bohannon or Abell to fill the number three shot (Bohannon has the better batting record, but Abell offers a back up seam option, which with Stokes unable to bowl could proved very useful). With Root and Stokes certain picks barring injury I would drop Bairstow to bring back Foakes as keeper, while the number eight slot either goes to Woakes if it looks like no spinner is needed or is a toss up between Rehan Ahmed and Liam Dawson if a spinner is deemed necessary. The 9,10 and 11 slots should go to Wood, Tongue and whichever of the two veterans Broad and Anderson is in better shape at the time.

PHOTOGRAPHS 1

THE WOMEN’S ASHES

The Women’s Ashes is played these days as a multi-format series, with the test match being worth four points and each other match being worth two points. England Women were in a similar position to the men’s team, having lost the test match and the first T20 match, which with Australia holding the urn meant that they also effectively needed to win every remaining game. They won both the second and third T20Is, the former being Australia’s first non-super over loss in the format since March 2021 and the latter being the first time Australia had lost two successive matches in any format since 2017 (also at England’s hands). This keeps England hopes alive going into the ODI element of the series.

The first of the two T20I victories was by only three runs, but it only became that close because with the match already settled Ellyse Perry hit the last two balls for sixes. The second was a more comfortable win for England.

PHOTOGRAPHS 2

Game on at Trent Bridge

A look at developments in the women’s test match at Trent Bridge and a photo gallery.

The Women’s Ashes test match at Trent Bridge is hotting up, as England bowlers get in among the wickets. This post looks at developments since yesterday.

THE REST OF YESTERDAY

During yesterday’s post I noted that Tammy Beaumont was hunting down records. She did break the Betty Snowball England record score that had stood since 1935, and she did complete her double century. She was finally last out for 208, the fifth highest score ever by a women’s test cricketer. England had tallied 463, a deficit of 10 on first innings. By the close Australia were 82-0 and it looked like they were in a very strong position.

TODAY

England bowled much better today, but Mooney and Litchfield pushed their opening stand up to 99 before the breakthrough occurred. Australia still looked in a very strong position at 178-3, but England have claimed four wickets in very quick time, and Australia are 198-7 with Alyssa Healy and Alana King batting together. For England Ecclestone has three wickets so far, giving her eight in the match, with veteran seamer Cross and young speedster Filer each claiming two scalps.

PHOTOGRAPHS

A small gallery today, but I hope a good one…

An All Time Classic Test Match

A look at the amazing test match the ended at 7:20PM yesterday and a substantial photo gallery.

This post looks back at a test match that had everything. From the moment Zak Crawley creamed the first ball of the match for four through to 7:20PM yesterday when Pat Cummins struck a four to third man to settle things the fortunes of war swayed hither and thither. I will be producing a detailed set of player ratings and a look at who England might pick to deal with obvious problems revealed in this match.

THE CLOSING STAGES

I was at work yesterday, but a rain delay at Edgbaston meant that I got to witness the closing stages of the match by way of Test Match Special and cricinfo. On a last day pitch definitely favouring spinners supposed front line spinner Moeen Ali had the indignity of being outbowled by part timer Joe Root. Stokes, injured knee and all, bowled with great determination. Broad and Robinson were both excellent, though Anderson did little. Stokes declined to take the new ball when it first became available, and when Root got Carey to make it 227-8, 54 still needed, it looked like the move had paid off. However Stokes persisted with the old ball, and Cummins and Lyon gradually settled in. Finally, with the deficit halved England took the new ball, but although Broad and Robinson bowled well they simply could not break through. In truth I had been rooting for what would have been only test cricket’s third ever tie, because each side had at least one player who did not deserve a loss – Khawaja for Australia and Root for England being the standouts. A tie clearly outranks a draw, as it is a result in keeping with the Stokes ethos. However, I have no complaints about the end result, and certainly none whatsoever about the final stages of the match.

ENGLAND’S MAIN PROBLEMS

I am going to start this post by stating firmly one thing that did not cause England to lose: Stokes’ declaration on the first evening has been the subject of much comment, a good deal of it hostile. The truth is the problems lay elsewhere than that decision:

  1. ‘samey’ main bowlers: as splendid as they all are at what they do Anderson, Broad and Robinson are too similar as bowlers for England to accommodate all three of them in the XI.
  2. Wrong choice of main spinner: it should not have surprised anyone that an ageing player who has not played red ball for a couple of years struggled with the extra workload entailed in bowling in the long form of the game, nor that someone coming into the match with a bowling average against Australia of 65 did not pose very much of a threat.
  3. Wrong choice of wicket keeper: for my money Bairstow’s three definite missed chances (two catches and one stumping), plus the potential chance he didn’t go for, leaving the ball to pass between him and Root for four more than neutralized his contribution with the bat. Last summer Bairstow played as a specialist batter, with Foakes behind the stumps, and if Bairstow has a role in the side it is as a batter, not a keeper/batter.
  4. Players getting in and getting themselves out. : in the second England innings three players got to 40, and not one of them went on to 50. At least one of those three should have gone on to a genuinely major innings.

PLAYER RATINGS

I will be going through each team in official batting order, using a scale of 0 (did nothing of value at all) through to 10 (perfection). Please note that when using such scales I use the whole scale – no courtesy marks just for turning up.

ENGLAND

Zak Crawley: 5. A dead average performance from someone who is in truth a dead average player – 61 in the first innings and a failure in the second is nothing special for an opener.

Ben Duckett: 2. Two failures with the bat this time, but he surely has credit in the bank from Pakistan and New Zealand to retain his slot.

Ollie Pope: 3. A promising start in the first innings, and his dismissal was somewhat unfortunate, but a skittish performance in the second in which he never looked like getting settled. Not one of the vice-captain’s finest outings.

Joe Root: 9.5. A glorious hundred in the first innings, joint top scorer in the second and out-bowled the ‘front line spinner’. Although this was a performance that underlined his status as one of the greatest cricketers his country has ever produced I dock him half a point for getting out on 46 in the second innings.

Harry Brook: 6. He was joint top scorer in the second innings, and bowled some tidy medium pace along the way.

Ben Stokes: 8. An overly frenetic batting performance in the first innings, but a much better effort second time round, and a determined bowling performance in spite of having knee trouble.

Jonny Bairstow: 4. The most controversial mark I am giving, but as I stated earlier in this piece I reckon that the chances he either missed or simply didn’t go for cost more runs (remember as well as the extra runs scored by the reprieved batters you have to factor in extra runs scored at the opposite end in the same period) than he contributed with the bat, and his second innings demonstrated another point about Bairstow the keeper/batter – he rarely scores well after a keeping performance. Since I have have him in net debit for the match I have to give him a below average score to reflect what was overall a below average performance, and on a scale of 0-10, 5 is average.

Moeen Ali: 3. Did not do a lot with the bat, and had a poor game with the ball, to the extent that on a final day pitch which was helping spinners he had the indignity of being out-bowled by part time Joe Root.

Stuart Broad: 8. A wholehearted bowling effort on a pitch that offered him absolutely nothing.

Ollie Robinson: 7. A solid bowling effort in unfavourable conditions, and some lower order runs in the second innings. His reaction to dismissing Khawaja in the first Australian innings attracted a lot of condemnation, but frankly given the way their bowlers have been known to treat opposition batters Aussies are the last to have any right to complain about this kind of thing

James Anderson: 4. Did little in the match, and I for one would not be terribly surprised if he missed Lord’s.

AUSTRALIA

Usman Khawaja: 9.5. A marathon effort with the bat in both innings. The only blot on his copybook is that he did not quite see the job through in the final innings.

David Warner: 4. Not absolute failure, but two moderate scores.

Marnus Labuschagne: 3. Failed twice with the bat.

Steve Smith: 3. The best current test batter in the world suffered a rare double failure in that department.

Travis Head: 5. Could not duplicate his brilliance against India in the WTC final, but not an outright poor performance.

Cameron Green: 7. Impressive with the bat, albeit assisted by Bairstow in the first innings, respectable with the ball, and fielded superbly.

Alex Carey: 8. Clearly the superior of the two keepers on show, and batted well, albeit with two assists from his opposite number in the first innings.

Pat Cummins: 9. His usual formidable self with the ball and batted well in both innings, getting Australia over the line in the second.

Nathan Lyon: 7. He took wickets in both innings, but also took some punishment. He was batting with Cummins when the winning runs were scored.

Scott Boland: 5. A poor match with the ball, but given how close it was his 20 as nightwatch in the fourth innings redeemed him somewhat.

Josh Hazlewood: 8. Bowled well on his return to the side from injury.

Full scorecard here.

SUGGESTED ENGLAND CHANGES

Foakes has to return to the side as keeper. I would personally achieve this by dropping Crawley, and having someone else open the innings. Ali cannot be retained, and I would say genuine possibilities are: Rehan Ahmed, Liam Dawson, Dan Moriarty (not a Surrey regular alas, but always bowls well when given the opportunity, as an FC bowling average of 27 suggests), Jack Carson, or the ultra-radical option of asking Sophie Ecclestone if she is up for playing alongside the men. Also, I would rest Anderson and bring in Wood to give the seam attack a point of difference. Chris Woakes has a splendid record at Lord’s, and playing him at number eight and relying on Root for spin is another option.

PHOTOGRAPHS

This has been a long post, but for those of you who made it to the finish this is my usual sign off…

Should Bairstow Keep Wicket For England This Summer?

A detailed answer to a question posed by talk sport radio on twitter this morning in the form of a look at the resources available to the England test team at the moment plus a photo gallery.

Another English cricket season is around the corner (some pre-season warm up fixtures are already taking place), and it is a biggie – the Aussies will be touring later this summer. My title comes from a question that talk sport radio put out on twitter this morning, and I am using this post to give it a detailed answer – the brief answer is the single word “no”.

ENGLAND’S RESOURCES

Since Ben Stokes took over the captaincy the England test team has fared exceedingly well, and the side’s unprecedented 3-0 sweep of the series in Pakistan plus the subsequent 1-1 draw in New Zealand (with the second game lost by one run, Stokes going uncompromisingly for the win rather than shut the game down to secure the series) were both achieved without Bairstow. The only real vacancy in the batting order is at the top, where Crawley’s returns continue to be utterly inadequate for a test match opening batter. Foakes, the current keeper, played important roles with the bat in several of the wins and is without any shadow of a doubt well clear of Bairstow as a keeper. The bowling is also strong, although the spin department remains a concern. Even there, with Rehan Ahmed showing positive signs in Pakistan, the trend is upwards.

BAIRSTOW IN TEST CRICKET

While in the period immediately before injury forced his withdrawal from the side Bairstow was in absolutely white hot form with the bat, his test history, which dates back to 2012, is of blowing hot and cold, with the latter more frequently the case. He is apparently not happy with the notion of opening in test cricket, though he does so in both forms of limited overs cricket. For me the middle order is strong with the question being who to leave out. One way to accommodate Bairstow is to have Stokes, who certainly has the technical wherewithal to do so move up to open the batting, creating a middle order slot for Bairstow (WG Rumblepants suggested this on twitter in response to the talk sport radio query). None of Pope, Root, Brook or Stokes are dispensable, and I regard the notion of dropping Foakes, already on the receiving end of scurvy treatment from England selectors since his international debut in 2018, as an outrage.

THE ENGLAND TEST SIDE GOING FORWARD

With the powerful batting outlined above, plus Foakes as keeper, a slew of fine seamers available, plus outright pacers in the form of Wood, Archer and possibly Stone in the wings, and Leach and Ahmed available to bowl spin, plus Will Jacks on the fringes as a batter who bowls spin on the side, and a few county players knocking on the doors (a good start to the season for Ben Compton would certainly force the selectors to sit up an take notice to name but one) the truth is that the England test side does not need to perform mental gymnastics to find a way to accommodate an ageing middle order batter with a history of inconsistency at the highest level – they would do better to move forwards without him.

PHOTOGRAPHS

To put it mildly the weather these last few days has been less than ideal for photography, but I do have a small gallery of recent captures to share…

Photographed through the window of a bus, a pair of goldfinches using a cable (obviously very well insulated) as a perch.