Dog in the Manger Day

An account of today’s match in the Women’s Hundred and a large photo gallery.

Todays women’s match in the Hundred featured last place Welsh Fire and second to last place Birmingham Phoenix, at the latter’s home ground, Fire’s elimination was already sealed, but big wins in their last three games plus a few results elsewhere going their way could still see Phoenix qualify.

Welsh Fire won the toss and chose to bat, virtually a mandatory decision since Edgbaston is a difficult chasing ground and Phoenix have not won a game when chasing in this year’s tournament. Beaumont swapped positions with Matthews in their order, moving up to open while Matthews came in at three. Dunkley started fast, but Beaumont’s promotion of herself did not work out as she hoped, the Fire captain scoring just 2 before she was out to make it 28-1. Matthews batted well, though scoring somewhat slowly, at number three, while Dunkley scored only the second 50+ score for Fire this season (their other such innings was also from her). Hannah Baker bowled her for 53 to make it 99-2 after 72 balls. Jess Jonassen came in at number four, and it was her contribution that would prove crucial to the result. It was Baker who was the main sufferer of Jonassen’s blitz. The young leg spinner had 1-15 from 16 balls, having accepted responsibility for bowling balls 91-95. She finished her allocation with 1-39, Jonassen having hit four successive sixes (the first two might both have been catches another day, so there was a measure of luck involved, but from 140 being in considerable doubt 160 was now on the horizon, with 150 a near certainty). The Aussie all rounder was out to the 98th ball of the innings, caught by Marie Kelly off Megan Schutt to make it 149-3. Jonassen had scored 44 from 17 balls. One further run accrued after her dismissal, so Phoenix had precisely 150 to defend, which given Phoenix’s chasing record meant the win was definitely on.

Georgia Voll took a four and single off the first two balls of the reply, bowled by Shabnim Ismail. Then Ismail bowled Emma Lamb with the fourth ball of the reply, giving the opener a second ball duck. That, and the dot ball to Marie Kelly that followed earned Ismail a second straight set of five, and with her sixth ball she struck Kelly’s pads and the umpire’s finger went up. Voll at the non-striker’s end did not suggest a review and Kelly walked off, only for the replay to show that the ball would have gone down the leg side. Voll herself reviewed an upheld appeal by Jess Jonassen which looked to be fairly plumb, but to well nigh universal surprise the replay showed that this one would also have missed leg (most were reckoning that it would have missed both leg and off stumps, by the same margin). Voll and Perry shared a good partnership, though they were always dropping behind the rate. With the score at 61, 29 of them to Voll, Jonassen got revenge for the overturned LBW by clean bowling Voll, a mode of dismissal that cannot be sent upstairs. That was the 45th ball of the innings, and Hayley Matthews’ off spin rounded out the first half of the chase. With the 46th ball of the innings she inflicted a first ball duck on Amy Jones, also bowled. Jones’ choice of shot was foolish but it was also a good ball from Matthews. Sterre Kalis now came in and played a reasonable supporting role for Perry, who was playing a fine innings. The trouble was that Kalis was struggling to score. She seemed to have got going when she struck a six and a four in successive balls, but off the next delivery she holed out to Ismail to give Jonassen a second wicket. Ailsa Lister also struggled for runs, and after scoring four off six balls she aimed a big shot at her seventh ball. bowled by Jonassen, and succeeded only in picking out Ismail. Ismail then accepted responsibility for bowling balls 91-95 (the asking rate by then was basically a boundary per ball, so she was looking to kill the match before the last five balls had to be bowled). The 92nd ball of the chase effectively ended Phoenix hopes of rising from the ashes, both in this match and in terms of the tournament as a whole. Ellyse Perry, Phoenix’ sole remaining hope of a miracle fell to a catch by Jonassen off Ismail to make it 108-7, 43 needed off eight balls at 5.375 per ball. By the time Ismail finished her allocation, with 3-16, the target was 40 off five balls, and almost whoever was chosen to bowl the final five balls was highly unlikely to suffer a sufficiently epic attack of the yips to make that a genuine possibility. In the event the vastly experienced Matthews was entrusted with the task. In those five balls she accounted for both Schutt and Mary Taylor (Mary Taylor is one of twins, with her twin sister Millie also being in the Phoenix squad – Mary bowls medium pace, Millie left arm wrist spin) and gave away only three runs, two of them off the final ball. Phoenix thus finished on 114-9, beaten by 36 runs. That sent them to the bottom of the table, with Fire now above them. Fire had done the ‘dog in the manger’ thing – unable to qualify themselves they had at least played a part in preventing another team from doing so as well. Scorecard here.

My usual sign off…

Three Teams, Two Spots

A look back at the two matches in the Women’s Hundred today and at the effect they had on the table, plus a photo gallery.

Today has been a ‘double double header’ day in The Hundred, and following my usual practice on such days I have listened to both women’s matches and am now tuned into the evening men’s match. This post looks back at what happened today and at how the table now shapes up.

Welsh Fire came into this match having lost all four of their fixtures this year, while Southern Brave had won all five of theirs. This should then have been an easy game for the Brave, and it looked to be playing out that way when Fire could do no better than 111 from their 100 balls batting first. However, although Brave seemed to have things under control for most of the chase they lost their way quite dramatically late on, and came very close to losing their unbeaten record this season. Off the penultimate ball of the match Georgia Adams played an airborne shot, Katie George made a superb effort in the field but dropped a desperately difficult chance and Adams was able to run the two that Brave needed to clinch the win with three wickets to spare. Fire performed excellently with the ball and in the field, but simply did not have enough runs to defend. Brave with six wins from six games have 24 points, and cannot now fail to qualify for Finals Day (and it will almost certainly be at the head of the table, getting them straight into the final). Fire by contrast are firmly pinned to the foot of the table, and even if every result from here on in goes their way cannot finish higher than fifth. Australian left arm spinner Jess Jonassen took 4-10 from her 20 balls for the Fire.

London Spirit won the toss and opted to bat first. That was the last moment at which anything went right for them. At low water mark they were 54-6, and over two-thirds of the way through their 100 balls. A minor fightback in the closing stages of their innings got them to 90-8, but that was miles short of a defensible total. Both openers for the Superchargers, Perrin and Davidson-Richards were out cheaply, but thereafter Phoebe Litchfield bossed proceedings, ably supported by another Australian, Annabel Sutherland. When Litchfield hit the winning runs in the form of her tenth four she moved to 55 not out off 38 balls, while Sutherland had 29 not out from 21 balls, and Superchargers had 34 balls as well as eight wickets to spare.

Southern Brave with a full haul of 24 points from six games are clear at the top. Northern Superchargers, Manchester Originals and London Spirit all have 16 points, also from six games each. Oval Invincibles have eight points from five games, which means that they are not quite out of it yet, but they are in the last chance saloon, with last orders having been called and the tables being cleaned and cleared around them, while Trent Rockets and Birmingham Phoenix are each on four points from five games, and will not feature beyond the group stage, and Welsh Fire, no points from five games bring up the rear. Even after todays wobbles the Southern Brave look by far the likeliest winners.

My usual sign off…

A Thriller To Start The Women’s Ashes

An account of the opening salvos in the Women’s Ashes and some photographs.

INTRODUCTION

Unlike the original Ashes, which have been fought for since 1882, the Women’s Ashes is contested across multiple formats. The current scoring system awards two points for a win in a limited overs match, 1 for a no-result and 0 for a defeat, while the sole test match is worth four points. 

A Classic Match

The first of three ODIs that the women will be contesting took place at the Allan Border Field in Brisbane. Australia won the toss and put England in to bat. Several England players got starts but none managed to build a really substantial score, Lauren Winfield leading the way with 48. A total of 228 off 50 overs did not look like it was good enough, and in the end it wasn’t.

Eng;land bowled better than they had batted, and at 87-4 Australia were looking distinctly shaky. Alex Hartley failed to hold a return catch offered by veteran Alex Blackwell when the latter had 35 to her name, and Australia were behind the rate, Talia McGrath having occupied 26 balls for a score of 7. This missed chance and some aggression from Ash Gardner (27 off 18) made the difference, Australia getting home in the final over with Blackwell unbeaten on 67. 

A highlight of this match was the preponderance of quality spin bowling on show – in Gardner, Amanda-Jade Wellington and Jess Jonassen Australia had three high-class practitioners, while Hartley and the experienced Laura Marsh both bowled well for England.

More details and official reports here.

ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ‘WOMEN’S ASHES’ AND ‘ASHES’

This applies across the board, and not just to cricket between England and Australia, but this seems a suitable place to mention this. I see the distinction between these categories as that between a restricted (“Women’s”) and an open category – if a woman is able to play alongside the men she should have the right to do so – the existence of Women only teams is an acknowledgement that few women could because the men are generally larger and stronger. Similarly if a disabled athlete happens to be performing comparably to their able-bodied counterparts they should be able to compete alongside them. 

In terms of cricket I would expect that a woman who earned selection for ‘The Ashes’ as opposed ‘The Women’s Ashes’ would not be a specialist fast-bowler, but I could see spinners, wicket-keepers or batters earning selection.

PHOTOGRAPHS

Here are some recent photographs…

FWContrasting ducksFarming implementMaids HeadMoorhens, Bawsey DrainMoorhen, Bawsey DrainGulls, Bawsey DrainMoorhen, The WalksSouth GateSouth Gate 2Swan, the NarSwans, The NarSwans, The Nar IIFlying birdsFlying birds IIShip and craneHH an RSCustom House

New flats
A new building among the old.

Thoresby CollegeMinsterTHTH2