Tag: Samantha Bates

A Study in Contrasts

A look back at today’s match between the Birmingham Phoenix and Trent Rockets women’s teams and last night’s contest between London Spirit and Manchester Super Giants men’s teams, plus a photo gallery.

This post focuses on two of the most dissimilar cricket matches you could imagine, last night’s match between the London Spirit and Manchester Super Giants (nee Originals) men’s sides (a combination of work yesterday and London Spirit women failing to show any of the quality for which they are named meant that I did not get to follow any of the women’s match), and this afternoon’s match between Birmingham Phoenix and Trent Rockets women’s sides. I will start with the latter first.

ONE WAY TRAFFIC IN BIRMINGHAM

Trent Rockets won the toss and opted to bowl. The biggest selection news was that England skipper Natalie Sciver-Brunt was missing due to workload management. How would Birmingham Phoenix react to their opponents being minus their star player? Almost as badly as a long ago South Africa men’s side did to news that Don Bradman would not be available for their opponents Australia. On that occasion South Africa proceeded to collapse for 36 and 45, still the lowest combined aggregate for which any test side has ever lost all 20 wickets. Here Phoenix were at one stage an eye-popping 15-6. They revived a little from that position, but it was blatantly obvious that they were mainly concerned with actually batting for 100 balls. They failed even to manage this, their tenth wicket falling to the 95th ball of their innings. They had scraped up a measly 64 all out, of which 39 had come from the bat of Ellyse Perry. Extras, with seven, was the second biggest contributor, while Eva Gray made six from number nine, Alana King five from number eight and Linsey Smith four from number 10. The Rockets bowling figures deserve quoting in full:

Kim Garth 15 balls, 11 dots, five runs conceded, two wickets taken.
Samantha Bates 20-13-10-3
Georgia Elwiss 20-12-13-3
Katie Levick 20-14-8-1
Ashleigh Gardner 15-5-19-1
Georgia Adams 5-1-4-0

Although Lauren Filer removed Beth Mooney for 4 with an absolute beauty Sophia Dunkley was already motoring by then and the Rockets were 40-1 from 19 balls. Sophie Luff came in at number three, and was instantly in command as well. Trent Rockets won by nine wickets with 69 of their 100 allotted balls unused. Sophia Dunkley had hit 43 not out from 17 balls with eight fours and a six, and Sophie Luff 19 not out from nine balls with four fours. Samantha Bates was named Player of the Match, a verdict with which it would be hard to argue. Scorecard here.

LIVINGSTONE’S LONE HAND

Manchester Super Giants were 65-1 after 42 balls and 105-2 after 67 balls. They fell away horribly from that high water mark, ending with 138-9 from their 100 balls. They bowled better than they had batted, and although Liam Livingstone played a great innings to follow a good effort with the ball London Spirit were never up with the rate at any stage of the chase. It was close in the final stages, but the 98th ball of the Spirit innings, bowled by 23 year old fast bowler Sonny Baker, who had claimed responsibility for closing things out, clean bowled him for 69 from 40 balls, making it 130-5, nine needed from two balls and a new batter coming in. Jamie Overton can hit a ball a very long way, but on this occasion he could do no better than a single, and with eight needed off one ball all Baker had to do was make sure it was a legal delivery. It was, and the heavily hyped James Coles hit it straight to Tom Moores, meaning that London Spirit ended up on 131-6, beaten by seven runs, a famous margin on the other side of the Thames (the match that led to the creation of The Ashes, at The Oval in 1882, went Australia’s way by that margin). Baker had been a little expensive earlier in the innings, but when it really counted he came good and won the match for his side. Livingstone, who had bowled his full allocation of 20 balls and taken 2-14 as well as playing the innings that kept his side in the hunt (though never, pace comments to the contrary by the so-called ‘expert summariser’, actually favourites to reach the target) was named ‘Match Hero’, a rare occasion when such an award to a member of the defeated side was entirely justified. Scorecard here.

PHOTOGRAPHS

A mixed gallery today, with some work pictures to start…

One of the things I am currently doing at work is cataloguing our whole stock of postcards.
…one of which has a ‘squared circle’ Crewe Station cancel on an Edward VII stamp, proving genuine age.
A painted lady and a bumblebee have targeted the same buddleia head.
Three gatekeeper butterflies on one bramble clump.

Thunder v Scorchers

A look at Sydney Thunder v Perth Scorchers in the WBBL and a lot of photos.

Today’s match in the Women’s Big Bash League saw Sydney Thunder hosting Perth Scorchers. The home side had been consistent in the wrong way, losing three out of three, while the visitors had been inconsistent. This post looks back at the match.

THE SCORCHERS INNINGS

Sydney Thunder won the toss and opted to bowl first. The first two overs were economical, but then Georgia Voll was entrusted with the third and Katie Mack hit the first three balls of the over for fours. By the end of their four over opening Power Play the Scorchers were 26-0, a modest tally in spite of Voll’s expensive over. The key reason for this was left arm spinner Samantha Bates, who bowled two of those four overs and conceded a mere eight runs. Katie Mack was in splendid form, while Beth Mooney hung in there. The first ball of the eighth over saw the 50 come up, and a strong finish to the first half of the innings saw the Scorchers go to drinks on 76-0 from 10 overs. The drinks break, as it quite often does, brought the wicket, Mooney falling immediately on the resumption. The young English left hander Freya Kemp came in at three and was briefly impressive before a run out ended her stay at the crease for 11 (6) to make it 90-2. Another Englishwoman, Paige Scholfield, followed Kemp to the crease, and hit her first ball for four, before being pinned LBW by her second and burning up a review in an attempt to overturn it. The great Kiwi veteran Sophie Devine was next and on this occasion failed to make it 98-4. With wickets tumbling the Scorchers delayed to Power Surge until overs 16 and 17. Samantha Bates, having already bowled two of her overs in the opening Power Play, now bowled her fourth and final over in what was both a Power Surge over and a death over. She did so superbly, and emerged with figures of 4-0-18-1, with three of those four overs bowled in the toughest periods of the innings. Scorchers just brought up the 150 before the end of their innings, the last ball of which saw the dismissal of Mack, who had batted on a different plane from most of her team mates, scoring 79 off 57 balls in all.

THE THUNDER REPLY

Although Sixers had very comfortably defended a smaller total than Scorchers’ 150 on this same ground a few days earlier there was still a suspicion that the Perth side had not done enough in their innings.

By the end of the opening Power Play that impression was reinforced as Thunder were 36-0 at that point, ten runs better than Scorchers had been. By the halfway stage Thunder had reached 80-1, only four runs better and one wicket worse than Scorchers. However, while Scorchers had struggled in the second half of their innings Thunder did not. At the 15 over stage it was 114-1, 37 needed off the last five overs with nine wickets standing, and now Phoebe Litchfield stepped on the gas for Thunder. No further wickets were taken, and it was Litchfield who ended proceedings by hitting the second ball of the 19th over for the only six of the match, a shot that took her to 50* (35), while at the other end Tahlia Wilson was 55* (44), with Georgia Voll having redeemed her poor bowling by contributing 43 from 31 balls at the top of the order. The only remaining question was Player of the Match. I regard the actual choice of Wilson as a clear-cut mistake – she scored at slower than the required rate, meaning that her team mates needed to do more than she was, which they managed easily enough. I would have been happy enough had it gone to Litchfield, whose late acceleration sealed the deal, but my own choice would have Bates for her bowling performance, which played a huge part in limiting the Scorchers to that 150 – her team mates conceded an average 8.25 from each of the 16 overs they bowlers, while she went for 18 from four, an ER of 4.50, and she bowled three of those four overs at tough stages of the innings. Had she matched the ER of her team mates, which would still have made it a good effort given when she bowled Scorchers would have had 165 to defend rather than 150, and those extra 15 runs may well have been enough.

PHOTOGRAPHS

My usual sign off…